What does Google’s new AI filmmaking tool mean for Papua New Guinea and its politics?

On the 20th of May, Google sent ripples of excitement and a fair share of apprehension through the creative and technological landscapes with the official unveiling of “Flow” at Google I/O 2025.
Google says this AI-powered filmmaking tool promises to democratize video creation, enabling users to generate cinematic content from simple text prompts and image references. The free version in Beta form is impressive even with its limitations.
It is built upon the foundation of Google DeepMind’s cutting-edge AI models which include the newly enhanced Veo 3 for high-resolution video and native audio generation, and Imagen 4 for detailed image “ingredients,” Flow aims to empower individuals and businesses alike to bring their visual ideas to life with unprecedented ease.
For content creators, flow allows you to input text descriptions, and the AI then generates corresponding video clips. Users can upload images to guide the style, subjects, and overall aesthetic of the generated footage.
It is a mind blowing development!
A significant advancement highlighted during the launch was Veo 3’s capability to generate synchronized audio, encompassing environmental sounds, music, and even rudimentary character dialogue – a feature that sets Flow apart from many existing AI video generation platforms.
What sets Flow apart from the rest, is that the tool has “Cinematic Control Features,” offering users the ability to influence camera movements, scene transitions through the “Scenebuilder,” and manage their creative assets effectively.
The emphasis on storytelling was clear during the announcement, with Google positioning Flow as a tool to help creators explore narratives and maintain visual and character consistency across multiple generated scenes.
Access to Flow is currently through a subscription model, available to Google AI Pro and Ultra subscribers in the United States, signaling a phased rollout strategy.
Within the next 12 months, video generation will become realistic to the point where it will be hard to tell the difference between real video and AI generated clips.
So how do we tell?
Recognizing the importance of responsible AI development, Google has integrated its SynthID watermarking technology into Flow’s outputs, ensuring that all AI-generated video and image content is subtly identifiable, promoting transparency and addressing concerns around misinformation.
What are the implications on political campaigns in Papua New Guinea?
The advent of AI video generation tools like Flow could have significant, and potentially complex, implications for political campaigns in Papua New Guinea.
In a landscape where visual narratives are influential, and where access to traditional filmmaking resources can be limited and expensive, Flow offers a powerful new avenue for political actors.
On one hand, Flow could enable smaller political parties and independent candidates with limited budgets to create compelling visual campaign materials. They could rapidly generate videos explaining their policies, showcasing community support (potentially through AI-generated visuals based on real-world descriptions), and crafting narratives designed to resonate with voters across diverse regions of Papua New Guinea. This could potentially level the playing field and allow for more diverse voices in the political discourse.
What are the risks?
On the flip side, the accessibility of such technology also presents considerable risks.The ease with which realistic-looking videos can be generated raises serious concerns about the potential for misinformation and disinformation campaigns.
Fabricated videos featuring political opponents making damaging statements or depicting false events could be easily created and disseminated, particularly through social media platforms which have a significant reach in urban centers and increasingly in rural areas with mobile internet access.
The lack of widespread digital literacy and media awareness in Papua New Guinea could make it challenging for voters to distinguish between authentic and AI-generated content. This could be exploited to manipulate public opinion and undermine the democratic process.
Regulatory frameworks and media literacy initiatives will likely need to evolve rapidly to address the challenges posed by AI-generated media in the political sphere.
The 2027 national elections, and those that follow, could see a significant shift in campaign strategies and the information landscape due to tools like Google’s Flow, demanding vigilance and proactive measures to safeguard the integrity of the electoral process.